AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Crookes atomic theory4/10/2024 ![]() In Montreal he devoted himself to the study of radioactivity, obtaining some tremendously important results. So much so that at the age of 27, in 1898, he was offered a professorship at the University of Montreal, which he accepted. At Cambridge Rutherford carried out his first research and published several articles that earned him the respect of the physicists of the time. Thomson himself and was one of the best-equipped laboratories in England. The setting chosen by the young Rutherford was the Cavendish Laboratory, which at the time was run by J.J. It was the year 1895 when a 24-year-old New Zealand physics graduate student named Ernest Rutherford arrived in Cambridge after winning a scholarship to continue his studies in England. Thomson tried to use this flaw to explain the phenomenon of radioactivity (in chapter VI of his book), the model was eventually discarded because it was superseded by a simpler model: Ernest Rutherford’s “ planetary” model. In other words, the model had a big problem with stability, and although J.J. But… how to keep such a system in equilibrium? On the one hand the electrons repel each other and on the other hand they are attracted by the field generated by the positive sphere. If we take the frequency \(\omega\) equal to \(6\cdot 10^m\) in perfect agreement with the experiments of the theory of gases among others. Where \(e\) is the electron charge and \(m\) its mass. Then, assuming that the positive sphere has radius \(R\), Newton’s laws in combination with Maxwell’s electrodynamics allow us to calculate the frequency of such radiation: Suppose for simplicity’s sake that we have a hydrogen atom, and assume, as was assumed at the time, that the oscillation of the electron inside the atom was responsible for the emission of electromagnetic waves of a given wavelength. ![]() ![]() Let us see what predictions this model could give us. The amount of total positive charge had to be equal to the sum of the charges on the electrons (because the atom was electrically neutral). describes his plum pudding model, which stated that the atom consisted of a positively charged sphere inside which the electrons (which he still called corpuscles) were contained. On page 96 of Chapter V of that book, J.J. The book “Electricity and Matter” by J.J. Thomson’s model appeared in a book entitled “Electricity and Matter” published in 1904, which Thomson himself wrote and in which he set out all his ideas on the subject. Thomson, who proposed a more or less reasonable model that could quantitatively explain some of the experimental results of the time, namely: the real dimensions of atoms and that inside them there must be small particles carrying charges (which would later be called electrons, something that Thomson himself would confirm in a classic experiment with cathode rays). ThomsonĪlthough the first atomic models date back to the Greeks, we will start a few centuries later with the plum pudding model of J.J. In this article we are going to tell how the first “ modern” atomic model came about, the well-known “ planetary” model now accepted by all and proposed by the English-based New Zealander Ernest Rutherford. If, like Newton, we try to visualise an atom as a hard, spherical body, or, like Boscovitch and Faraday, consider it as a centre of force, or accept Lord Kelvin’s vorticial atomic theory, an isolated atom is an unknown entity difficult to conceive of.Ĭrookes’ statement is insightful, for indeed the atom is too small to see, but everything is made up of millions and millions of these tiny bricks. What is the atom, and is it the same atom that appears in solid, liquid or gaseous states? Each of these states involves ideas that have to do only with vast groupings of atoms. The most representative example of what was known about the subject is well described in a speech given by the eminent English chemist and physicist William Crookes at the Congress of the British Association for the Advancement of Science in 1898: While most scientists had no doubt that matter was made up of atoms, none of them had any idea what those atoms looked like. CrookesĪt the end of the 19th century, it was not clear how matter was constituted. In this post we are going to tell the story of the discovery of atomic structure and, of course, the role that mathematics played in that discovery. We have devoted several of our previous posts (see here and here, for example) to explain how the attempt to understand certain natural phenomena led physicists and mathematicians in the early 20th century to propose some unorthodox theories.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |